Skip to main content

What the hell did I just watch?!

Originally posted: August 18, 2005

ZARDOZ

This 1974 John Boorman written and directed film stars Sean Connery, Charlotte Rampling and a bunch of UK actors I don't know - which for me is saying alot.

Set in 2293, the world is set up like this: The "Brutals" live in a sort-of wasteland where they are either forced to work or killed by one of the "Executioners" Connery plays "Zed", an executioner that wonders what it's all about. He and the other executioners pray to their god, ZARDOZ, a giant flying stone head that arrives, decrees and - what I can only describe as - spews forth guns and ammo from it's mouth before it flies away. Stay with me, here.

Zed stows away in the head under a pile of grain (grown by the Brutals as an offering). Inside, he sees a man called Arthur Frayn, which he shoots - he is an executioner, after all. The stone head lands in a utopian society inhabited by the "Immortals", a group of intellectuals that, somehow, banished death by, from what I can tell, declaring death to be gone. The only way they grow older is as a punishment for a societal infraction. When Zed arrives, he is seen as a disturbance to the balance and harmony of the community by some and a curiosity that needs to be studied by others.

Now, Zed, being a mortal, fascinates the Immortals and his energy/lifeforce invigorates the Immortals to question themselves and existence itself.

So, there's a brief description. I watched this one, then restarted it to listen to the commentary by John Boorman. He explains alot - not all - of the story. He admits there may be too many ideas going on, and, during a long montage, tells the viewer they can fast forward is they want.

After my 1st viewing, I wondered why Connery would take on such a bizarre part. I found out - listening to Boorman - that in '73, after Connery quit being Bond...James Bond, he couldn't get hired. Looking back at Connery's career, can you imagine him not being able to get an acting job?

I recommend this one for a few reasons:

1) It's a great, overblown mind-fuck, which everyone can use once in a while.

2) It poses many questions about religion, existence, procreating, and the nature of life itself.

3) There are topless women in it (deal with it).

4) Guaranteed you've never seen a film like it.

There are 3 tag lines for this film:

1) Beyond 1984, Beyond 2001, Beyond Love, Beyond Death

2) I have seen the future and it doesn't work

3) Into a world of eternal life, he brought the gift of death

Definitely some good eye candy to boot.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

giving humor a bad name

Why is it that when someone in politics - or just in the public eye - says something offensive, they back peddle and claim they were trying to tell a joke or be funny? Read the following article from Politico.com and you tell me, was the comment by Michael Barone of U.S. News and World Report funny in any way at all: Barone: Media wanted Palin abortion By MIKE ALLEN & ANDY BARR | 11/11/08 5:58 PM EST A roomful of academics erupted in angry boos Tuesday morning after political analyst Michael Barone said journalists trashed Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the Republicans' vice presidential nominee, because "she did not abort her Down syndrome baby." Barone said in an e-mail that he "was attempting to be humorous and ... went over the line." Barone was speaking at the Palmer House Hilton in Chicago, to the 121st annual meeting of the National Association of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges, which calls itself the nation’s oldest higher-education associatio...

Buckin' Fig is now open

Hey there! Well, I've decided to step out of the occasional myspace blog and start my own. Why? Cuz I wanna. I'll post some of my earlier blogs - the one's I actually wrote - here soon. I plan to post frequently, but that's subjective to me so let's say I'll post when I can about any number of topics. Welcome and I hope this works. Later Me

'Tis the season to be voting

I haven't enjoyed a primary season like this one in SUCH a long time! First, I'll say, I haven't paid as much attention to primaries in the past as I have this one, but damn, I sure picked a good one. So, Clinton and Obama are in a dead heat (always thought that was a weird phrase). OK. I'm an Obama supporter, but if Clinton gets the nomination, I'm fine with that. If all of the Democratic contestants were still in the race, she wouldn't be my second choice either. However, if it's her, I can deal. I'd like to see how a female president would work. I think, very well. I do feel - though - that we need a real change in this country. The idea of Bush - Clinton - Bush - Clinton is not appealing to me at all. Yes, things were going well in the 90s, but that's so last millennium. Enough of the past. I think we need a real change, or - to paraphrase Monty Python - we need something completely different. I think that's Barack Obama. As much ...